tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4718931137844429374.post6466061706966267005..comments2023-04-06T03:04:29.318-05:00Comments on The Bounds of Cognition: Burge in the NYTAnonymoushttp://www.blogger.com/profile/08539727534751588479noreply@blogger.comBlogger3125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4718931137844429374.post-41226164869244380822010-12-23T17:24:42.418-06:002010-12-23T17:24:42.418-06:00And others have liked it even less:
http://feminis...And others have liked it even less:<br />http://feministphilosophers.wordpress.com/2010/12/20/a-philosopher-in-the-ny-times-again/<br /><br />I guess that my standards for popular work are just a lot lower than others. I thought that Noe had fine posts at NPR, even though I don't buy very much of what he has to say.Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/08539727534751588479noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4718931137844429374.post-29627537325558065702010-12-21T13:07:54.362-06:002010-12-21T13:07:54.362-06:00I prefer Gary Williams' critique (at Minds and...I prefer Gary Williams' critique (at Minds and Brains), although being a committed Rortian - hence, anti-representationalism - and an incipient O'Reganite wrt his sensorimotor view, I'm no doubt biased. But IMO, so is Eric, the main referent of my comment in the Gibson-retinal-image-4 thread about those who see little if any role in these matters for "arm chair philosophers" (AKA system architects/analysts) - and perhaps for psychologists as well.Charles T. Wolvertonhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/12309746685166449683noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4718931137844429374.post-6079703999079614762010-12-21T07:36:13.894-06:002010-12-21T07:36:13.894-06:00Others are less impressed: http://philosophyofbrai...Others are less impressed: http://philosophyofbrains.com/2010/12/20/burge-against-neurobabble.aspx?ref=rssAnonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/08539727534751588479noreply@blogger.com