I think it would be great if some enactivist could write up a nice little paper explaining how this enactivist naturalized semantics would go. (Or, maybe there is something out there already I don't know about.) Just a set of sufficiency conditions to set alongside the Fodor, Dretske, and Millikan theories. I would bet
Mind & Language would publish such a paper. I would bet it could easily be written up in a few weeks. When I read Thompson, for example, I just see little hints, but I don't really get a clean picture of what the account is.
No comments:
Post a Comment